America First Was a Scam: Leaked Docs Prove Trump Sold Out to Israel

From the very beginning of his political journey in 2016, Donald Trump emerged with the slogan “America First,” and in the years that followed, he sought to legitimize and build upon this idea throughout his presidency. However, recent events in West Asia and the United States’ military involvement in the region have sparked widespread doubt among the American public: Was “America First” merely a campaign slogan to win votes, or a genuine guiding principle in Trump’s foreign policy?

This article examines the truth behind Trump’s “America First” agenda and explores how it aligns—or clashes—with his recent foreign policy moves.


Prioritizing Israel’s Interests in U.S. Foreign Policy

For decades, U.S. politics has consistently leaned toward securing the interests of the Zionist regime. Media coverage, official statements, and speeches by key U.S. figures all point to this trend. Many members of the U.S. Congress openly advocate for prioritizing Israel’s interests, and this pattern was no different during the Trump administration.

The recent military conflict involving Israel and Iran clearly shows that Trump’s support for Israel is virtually unlimited. His unwavering backing underscores the extent to which Israel’s interests have taken precedence in U.S. foreign policy—casting serious doubt on the authenticity of the “America First” doctrine.

The contradiction between America’s stated priorities and its unconditional support for Israel reveals the deep influence the Zionist regime holds over the American political structure. The ongoing regional crises instigated by Israel, and supported by the U.S., starkly contradict Trump’s repeated promises to put American interests first. As a result, this inconsistency has seriously undermined public trust in the “America First” slogan.


Unprecedented Influence of Zionist Lobbies in U.S. Decision-Making

Zionist lobbying groups—particularly AIPAC—have long cemented their influence in American political life. These lobbies play a powerful role in shaping core policy decisions across multiple U.S. administrations, even influencing presidential elections.

The unwavering U.S. support for Zionist governments is largely driven by the efforts of these lobbying groups. Their influence extends deep into Congress and often dictates foreign policy, even when those policies contradict the strategic interests of the United States. A key example is the decision to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem—an action pushed forward by Zionist lobbies despite its clear conflict with U.S. national interests.


A Deep Divide within the American Conservative Movement

The American conservative political landscape is increasingly polarized. One faction advocates aggressive and interventionist policies, supporting Israel unconditionally—even at the risk of regional war. Senator Lindsey Graham is a prominent figure in this group, which diverges sharply from traditional conservative principles like the Monroe Doctrine.
In contrast, the MAGA faction—represented by figures such as media host Tucker Carlson—believes U.S. interests should take precedence and views regional wars as contrary to America’s strategic goals. This internal rift has caused confusion and contradiction within Trump’s camp and could potentially alienate more supporters, as it did with figures like John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Elon Musk.


Weaponizing Israel to Justify Aggressive Policies

Some international policy analysts believe that the Trump administration strategically used Israel as a tool to extract concessions from Iran that it couldn't achieve at the negotiating table. According to Western media analysis, Israel has effectively become a lever to push Washington toward direct confrontation with Iran. In the wake of recent attacks, several U.S. senators openly advocated for military action against Iran.
This reflects a broader, behind-the-scenes policy direction within the U.S. political system—one driven by powerful lobbies that aim to achieve their goals by any means necessary, including military conflict.


Conclusion

Over the past several years, U.S. policy has been overwhelmingly tilted in favor of Zionist interests—so much so that successive administrations appear unable to diverge from this path. Trump's promises to prioritize American interests seem, in retrospect, little more than vote-winning rhetoric.

Looking ahead, the key question remains: how far is the U.S. government willing to sacrifice its own national interests in service of the Zionist regime?


*Translated by Ashraf Hemmati from the original Persian article written by AmirAli Yeganeh