From Cold War Allies to Adversaries: Decoding the Motives and Policies Behind 9/11
From Cold War Allies to Adversaries: Decoding the Motives and Policies Behind 9/11
The September 11 incident, orchestrated by al-Qaeda, stands as a pivotal event in modern history with profound implications for US military involvement in the Middle East, particularly the withdrawal of US forces from Saudi Arabia. This article seeks to examine the underlying motives, obscured truths, and consequential policies adopted by Washington in the region.
Drawing upon the insights of esteemed experts and scrutinizing available evidence, it seeks to shed light on the lingering uncertainties surrounding the tragedy while questioning the dynamics of profiteering within the arms industry. Ultimately, advocating for a recalibration of American engagement in the Middle East and the pursuit of a lasting resolution.
Historical Context
Dr. William O. Beeman, a distinguished academician and head of the anthropology department at the University of Minnesota, provides valuable insights into the direct support extended by the American government to al-Qaeda operatives, including Osama bin Laden, during the Cold War. This support was primarily driven by America's strategic objective of countering Soviet influence in the region. However, both the United States and the Saudi Arabian government have concealed this truth, resulting in a complex narrative surrounding the September 11 attacks.
The Neoconservative Agenda
Contrary to conventional expectations, the Bush administration, under the maxim "never let a good crisis go to waste," seized the tragedy as an opportunity to implement the "neoconservative" strategy. This entailed a fundamental restructuring of Middle Eastern governments that posed a threat to American interests, rather than singularly condemning Saudi Arabia for the attacks.
Unresolved Questions
Despite the official attribution of responsibility to al-Qaeda for the September 11 incident, numerous uncertainties persist even after more than two decades, as underscored by the official narratives published. Eminent nuclear physicist Dr. Steven Jones emerges as a leading researcher challenging the accepted explanations, positing the hypothesis of an "engineered explosion" as the sole plausible explanation for the free fall of the Twin Towers.
The Arms Industry and Perpetual Wars
A prevalent belief suggests that arms dealers are the primary beneficiaries of warfare. The American attack on Afghanistan, immediately following the 9/11 events, exemplified a continuation of the policy of perpetuating endless wars in the Middle East with no intention of cessation.
The Iraq Quagmire
Exploiting the pretext of weapons of mass destruction, the United States launched a seven-year-long attack on Saddam Hussein's regime. Despite the cessation of the war and Saddam's execution, the US maintained its military presence in Iraq, perpetuating foreign dominance and impeding the formation of independent Muslim governments.
The Obama Era and Continued Conflict
The policies of the Obama administration failed to bring about a significant shift in American warmongering. The emergence of ISIS, allegedly with covert American support, contradicts President Barack Obama's claims regarding the capture of Osama bin Laden as the primary perpetrator of the Twin Towers bombing.
Ongoing Conflict and Symbolic Military Bases
The United States sustained its military involvement in the Middle East, conducting air attacks on Yemen and maintaining forces and bases in Iraq despite the Iraqi Parliament's resolution calling for their withdrawal. However, recent events, including Iran's retaliatory missile strikes, underscore the diminishing significance of these bases, necessitating a reassessment of American authority.
Conclusion
The United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan and the subsequent transfer of power to the Taliban represent a recognition by the American government of the need for a new approach. It is imperative for the United States to relinquish control of Iraq to its rightful owners, the Iraqi people, and permanently disengage from the volatile Middle Eastern region. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine potentially signifies a shift in the arms industry's profit dynamics, prompting reflection on the long-term profitability of arms sales in the Middle East.
